An Open Letter To Jonathan Ive (and Apple)
Saturday, July 7, 2012 at 01:36PM Yes my short story, the iHole, was here. No, it's not there now...
Yes, there was an open letter to Jonathan Ive (and Apple) here. No, there isn't now.
Sorry about that. (If you are REALLY disappointed, here's a different free story instead, as a consolation prize. It's a comedy about a financial catastrophe involving goats. You might even like it more than The iHole.)
Back to the missing iHole.... For background, I'll just quote briefly from the original open letter:
"Dear Jonathan,
My name is Julian Gough. I write fiction. And I have a problem that only you can solve.
I recently wrote a short story called The iHole, and I think it’s the best I’ve ever written. It’s about the design of an imaginary product, and it’s set inside a fictional version of Apple, at some time in the near future. A fictional version of you is mentioned, by name, a couple of times, though he stays offstage as a character.
A major media player wants the story. Their editorial people love the story. The potential audience is a million plus. So far, so good. But now their lawyers have asked me to change the name of the fictional company from Apple, and change the name of the character I’ve called Jonathan Ive..."
OK, I put that letter, and the story, online three days ago. This morning, we've all come to a satisfactory resolution. I'm really sorry if you came here to read The iHole and are disappointed. It will be available (legally) again later this year, honest.
First, I want to say thanks to everyone - Minecraft fans, fiction fans - on Twitter and elsewhere, for their support, encouragement (and even editorial suggestions), over the past three days.
And second, I want to say that THERE ARE NO VILLAINS in what's just happened. Apple behaved perfectly, and the media organisation wanting to use The iHole behaved perfectly, as did their lawyers. I'm not mad at anyone and I don't want you to be mad at anyone. if there was a problem here, it was with archaic laws that make it hard for writers to write about the modern world.
In fact, I particularly want to defend the media organisation involved. There are precious few media outlets for short stories already, so the last thing these guys deserve is to be kicked for having the courage to take on an unusually tricky modern story like mine. They have behaved impeccably throughout, attempting to keep the story intact while still obeying the law.
My attempts to sort this out directly, by going over their heads, have almost certainly made their lives more difficult, for which I apologize. There's always a healthy creative tension between the artist and the industry, but I realize I generate a lot more tension than most. Sorry, everyone...
Finally, I'm happy that we seem to have sorted out a compromise that doesn't damage the story artistically. And I'm very happy to discover that such large numbers of people can still get excited, and passionate, over a short story.
Fond regards,
-Julian Gough


Photo courtesy Sophie Gough Fives (age 7)
Apple,
Dieter Rams,
Dubliners,
James Joyce,
Jonathan Ive,
The iHole,
censorship,
design,
iPad,
lawyers,
self-censorship,
short stories in
Art,
Literature,
Politics,
The Internet,
Work 



Reader Comments (17)
Brilliant. Your best.
Thanks
Kevin
Good luck and may goodness prevail!!
Fiona
If anything interesting happens before Thursday, I'll tell you...
-Julian
I am posting from Chile quite touched by your open letter and marveled by the power of social media as I have no doubts Mr. Ivy has already read The iHole.
Brilliant work on both pieces
Good luck, Henry Northcote
Thanks for letting me read what is a great story. I really should read more fiction again.
Regards
Refer to Steve and Jonathan as "Steve" and "Jonathan" and leave last names out. We'll get it.
The A-Hole joke was unnecessary and seems out of place. If you must use the joke, find a way for the reader to come up with it. "Bill wants the product name to collate before everyone else's." "The most I'll personally sign off on is 'B-Hole'."
Nicely done otherwise. Only the vaguest hint of Thierry tipping over before the end. Good work.
One minor correction: "Thierry was allowed keep" ---> "Thierry was allowed to keep"
Look at it this way: How would it change the story, if the company was a smaller company? Are you thinking only a company like apple would be able to fund the project? Or do you want to "loan" the idea of MULTI NATIONAL being the product of normal, though talented people?
If you want the story to be a social commentary, and not worry about details like funding, all you need is to place the iHole into context: THAT the world is full of all kinds of i-stuff. Thus inferring that the iHole is just another gizmo in a gizmo-infected world. For this you do not need to be INSIDE Apple.
The ending is chilling, though. Even if the ending is a mercifull return of investment, brought on by the author, being able to remotely force a re-coding af a product to suit your own end, be it a depressing state or for capital gain, is a terrible thing.
Vico @ http://griyamobilkita.webs.com